- Companies Index
- Government Index
- Home
- About Us
- Our Work
- Why It Matters
- Defence Corruption Risks Typology
- Diagnosing Corruption Risks
- Metrics & Surveys
- Self-Assessment Process
- research
- Companies Index
- Preliminary Results
- Northrop Grumman
- MTU Aero Engines
- Babcock International
- DCNS
- EMBRAER
- Fujitsu
- Lockheed Martin
- Rolls Royce
- Safran
- Thales
- BAE Systems
- Dyncorp
- General Electric
- Harris Corporation
- Hewlett Packard
- Raytheon
- Honeywell
- ITT Corporation
- KBR Inc
- L3 Communications
- Nec Corporation
- Rockwell Collins
- SAIC
- ST Engineering
- Meggit
- Arsenal AD
- Cobham
- Curtiss Wright
- Day & Zimmermann
- General Dynamics
- Patria
- QinetiQ
- Rafael Advanced Defense Systems
- RUAG
- Russian Helicopters
- Saab
- Textron
- Ultra Electronics
- Serco
- EADS
- Dassault Aviation
- Fluor
- Diehl Stiftung
- CAE Inc
- MDBA Missile Systems
- Thyssen Krupp 2
- Finmeccanica 2
- Goodrich Corporation
- United Technologies
- Aselsan
- Agility
- Jacobs Engineering
- Wyle
- Cubic Corporation
- AAR
- Alion Science and Technology
- ATK
- Booz Allen Hamilton
- CSC
- FLIR
- Mantech
- Teledyne Technologies
- VSE Corporation
- Nammo
- Daewoo
- Samsung
- MTU
- Otokar
- Oshkosh Corporation
- Krauss-Maffei Wegmann
- Damen Schelde
- LIG Nex 1
- Poongsan
- Chemring
- Rheinmetall
- Hindustan Aeronautics
- Navantia
- CACI International
- General Atomics
- SRA International
- SRC Inc
- URS Corporation
- Fincantieri
- Mitsubishi Heavy Industries
- Indra
- Aviation Industry Corporation
- Avibras
- Avio
- Battelle
- Bharat Earth Movers Limited
- Bharat Electronics
- Boustead
- Bumar Group
- China Shipbuilding Industry Corporation
- Navistar
- Doosan DST
- Elbit Systems
- GKN
- Gorky Automobile Plant
- Israel Aerospace Industries
- Israel Military Industries
- Kawasaki Heavy Industries
- Mitsubishi Electric
- Nexter
- Zodiac SA Holding
- Denel
- RTI Systems
- Accenture
- Abu Dhabi Shipbuilding
- Tatra
- testing
- Defence Companies Anti-Corruption Index: Preliminary results - Part B
- Preliminary Results
- Government Index
- Gov Index Preliminary Results
- Kenya
- Russia
- Ghana
- Hungary
- Cyprus
- Argentina
- France
- Cote D'Ivoire
- Serbia
- Afghanistan
- Iran
- Bulgaria
- Kazakhstan
- Croatia
- Algeria
- Jordan
- Thailand
- Ukraine
- Italy
- India
- Nigeria
- Iraq
- Eritrea
- Cameroon
- Syria
- Sweden
- Somalia
- China
- Democratic Republic of the Congo
- South Africa
- Israel
- Kuwait
- Latvia
- West Bank
- Rwanda
- Singapore
- Ethiopia
- Nepal
- Turkey
- Pakistan
- United Kingdom
- Bangladesh
- Brazil
- USA
- Belarus
- Australia
- Georgia
- Poland
- Qatar
- Uzbekistan
- Venezuela
- Colombia
- Greece
- Saudi Arabia
- Austria
- Morocco
- Yemen
- Zimbabwe
- Indonesia
- Bahrain
- Sri Lanka
- Angola
- Tunisia
- South Korea
- Bosnia and Herzegovina
- Mexico
- Czech Republic
- Lebanon
- Singapore
- Norway
- Philippines
- UAE
- Tanzania
- Japan
- Malaysia
- Germany
- Oman
- Slovakia
- Chile
- Spain
- Uganda
- Lybia
- Egypt
- Taiwan
- With Governments & Armed Forces
- With the Defence Industry
- Education & Training
- Tackling Defence Corruption Around the World
- Focus Areas
- Tools & Resources
- Publications
- FAQ
- Media Room
- Defence Corruption News Digest
- News Archive
- Upcoming Events
- Our Programme in the Media
- What we are Reading/Listening to
- Press Releases
- Events Archive
- 'The Transparency of Defence Budgets' got high media attention in launch in Malaysia
- Blog
- jobs
Frequently Asked Questions
Do you investigate individual cases of corruption in defence and security?Isn’t defence and security just too secretive to make any real changes towards transparency and integrity?How can Transparency International's Defence and Security Programme (TI DSP) ensure that reforms made in the defence and security establishments you work in are genuine, and not completed to get a ‘stamp of approval’ from an international NGO?How does Transparency International's Defence and Security Programme (TI DSP) fit into the Transparency International movement as a whole?What countries and organisations does TI DSP work with?Who funds TI DSP?Contact us if you have any further questions. Do you investigate individual cases of corruption in defence and security?The Transparency International Defence and Security Team does not investigate individual cases of defence corruption. Instead, we focus on active and direct engagement with defence and security establishments to help build counter- and anti-corruption mechanisms. We strongly believe that engaging with defence companies, the armed forces, defence officials, and security personnel can create long-lasting, sustainable change, and that it is in the best interests of all parties to tackle corruption in these establishments. TI DSP support the rights of whistleblowers, journalists, and all those who uncover cases of corruption in defence and security. In many countries, this is an extremely dangerous field of work. We respect and admire these individuals, and often depend upon their work. Our team believes that defence and security establishments benefit greatly from engagement with civil society, particularly with regard to monitoring and oversight, and believe that we, and TI National Chapters, can play that role in a powerful and supportive way that has major benefits for all parties involved. Transparency International runs Advocacy and Legal Advice Centres (ALACs) in more than 40 countries worldwide. At ALACs, victims and witnesses of corruption can receive free and confidential legal advice. This includes victims of corrupt practices by the police or military services. For more information about ALACs and to locate one in your country, click here. To report cases of corruption in the UK, contact Crime Stoppers. Isn’t defence and security just too secretive to make any real changes towards transparency and integrity?No. TI DSP has extensive experience working in some of the most challenging countries, where many people—including experts—have told us that getting involved is impossible. Corruption has a negative impact on governments, the armed forces, and ministries of defence and security. These establishments are the first to gain from a corruption-free environment where operations are conducted with transparency and integrity. Corruption in defence deludes prestige, weakens national security, misuses funds, encourages criminal activity and undermines professionalism. Because TI DSP’s approach is collaborative, rather than investigative, we seek to aid defence and security establishments to make positive change that is in their best interest.
It is also in the best long-term interest of defence companies to conduct business in a transparent, non-corrupt way. According to a 2006 survey by Control Risks, one third of defence sector respondents felt that they had lost out on a contract in the previous year due to bribery by a competitor. Defence companies shun corrupt economies and the risks they pose. In addition, high profile cases have shown that corruption in defence companies is often uncovered and can pose a major reputational risk. Defence and security activities are important aspects of every government’s work. In most countries around the world, they also take up a significant portion of national funds. Money spent on defence and security is often vital and justified; however, it is important that there is public oversight of how these sectors operate, as they are supported by public funds and should be for the public’s protection. When defence and security establishments engage in corruption, public funds are wasted, scarce resources are lost or misappropriated, economic development is obstructed, and peacekeeping missions are impeded. They are not held accountable to their citizens. Perhaps most importantly, the defence and security services are prevented or hindered from achieving their primary purpose: protecting a country’s citizens. Read more about why corruption matters. How can Transparency International's Defence and Security Programme (TI DSP) ensure that reforms made in the defence and security establishments you work in are genuine, and not completed to get a ‘stamp of approval’ from an international NGO?Although TI DSP works closely with governments, we do not give public endorsement or approval for any of the establishments we work with. We firmly believe that accountability and integrity are in the best interests of all defence and security establishments around the world; one of our first jobs is often to explain to individuals in these establishments that this is the case, and why. This argument goes far. In general, the majority of people around the world want to work in establishments that are effective and respected. TI DSP can help them achieve that goal, but we do not endorse the results on their behalf. How does Transparency International's Defence and Security Programme (TI DSP) fit into the Transparency International movement as a whole?We are part of Transparency International’s UK (TI UK) chapter, based in London. TI UK works mainly on UK corruption issues, whereas the Defence and Security Programme has a global mandate and works with countries and other Transparency International chapters around the world. What countries and organisations does TI DSP work with?
TI DSP is an independent, not-for-profit NGO. We work with a wide variety of international organisations, defence and security forces, defence ministries, military academies, government bodies, civil society groups and defence companies worldwide. Who funds TI DSP?TI DSP currently receives generous funding from DFID and NATO. We provide our Annual Review and Funding information here. |





