- Companies Index
- Government Index
- Home
- About Us
- Our Work
- Why It Matters
- Defence Corruption Risks Typology
- Diagnosing Corruption Risks
- Metrics & Surveys
- Self-Assessment Process
- research
- Companies Index
- Preliminary Results
- Northrop Grumman
- MTU Aero Engines
- Babcock International
- DCNS
- EMBRAER
- Fujitsu
- Lockheed Martin
- Rolls Royce
- Safran
- Thales
- BAE Systems
- Dyncorp
- General Electric
- Harris Corporation
- Hewlett Packard
- Raytheon
- Honeywell
- ITT Corporation
- KBR Inc
- L3 Communications
- Nec Corporation
- Rockwell Collins
- SAIC
- ST Engineering
- Meggit
- Arsenal AD
- Cobham
- Curtiss Wright
- Day & Zimmermann
- General Dynamics
- Patria
- QinetiQ
- Rafael Advanced Defense Systems
- RUAG
- Russian Helicopters
- Saab
- Textron
- Ultra Electronics
- Serco
- EADS
- Dassault Aviation
- Fluor
- Diehl Stiftung
- CAE Inc
- MDBA Missile Systems
- Thyssen Krupp 2
- Finmeccanica 2
- Goodrich Corporation
- United Technologies
- Aselsan
- Agility
- Jacobs Engineering
- Wyle
- Cubic Corporation
- AAR
- Alion Science and Technology
- ATK
- Booz Allen Hamilton
- CSC
- FLIR
- Mantech
- Teledyne Technologies
- VSE Corporation
- Nammo
- Daewoo
- Samsung
- MTU
- Otokar
- Oshkosh Corporation
- Krauss-Maffei Wegmann
- Damen Schelde
- LIG Nex 1
- Poongsan
- Chemring
- Rheinmetall
- Hindustan Aeronautics
- Navantia
- CACI International
- General Atomics
- SRA International
- SRC Inc
- URS Corporation
- Fincantieri
- Mitsubishi Heavy Industries
- Indra
- Aviation Industry Corporation
- Avibras
- Avio
- Battelle
- Bharat Earth Movers Limited
- Bharat Electronics
- Boustead
- Bumar Group
- China Shipbuilding Industry Corporation
- Navistar
- Doosan DST
- Elbit Systems
- GKN
- Gorky Automobile Plant
- Israel Aerospace Industries
- Israel Military Industries
- Kawasaki Heavy Industries
- Mitsubishi Electric
- Nexter
- Zodiac SA Holding
- Denel
- RTI Systems
- Accenture
- Abu Dhabi Shipbuilding
- Tatra
- testing
- Defence Companies Anti-Corruption Index: Preliminary results - Part B
- Preliminary Results
- Government Index
- Gov Index Preliminary Results
- Kenya
- Russia
- Ghana
- Hungary
- Cyprus
- Argentina
- France
- Cote D'Ivoire
- Serbia
- Afghanistan
- Iran
- Bulgaria
- Kazakhstan
- Croatia
- Algeria
- Jordan
- Thailand
- Ukraine
- Italy
- India
- Nigeria
- Iraq
- Eritrea
- Cameroon
- Syria
- Sweden
- Somalia
- China
- Democratic Republic of the Congo
- South Africa
- Israel
- Kuwait
- Latvia
- West Bank
- Rwanda
- Singapore
- Ethiopia
- Nepal
- Turkey
- Pakistan
- United Kingdom
- Bangladesh
- Brazil
- USA
- Belarus
- Australia
- Georgia
- Poland
- Qatar
- Uzbekistan
- Venezuela
- Colombia
- Greece
- Saudi Arabia
- Austria
- Morocco
- Yemen
- Zimbabwe
- Indonesia
- Bahrain
- Sri Lanka
- Angola
- Tunisia
- South Korea
- Bosnia and Herzegovina
- Mexico
- Czech Republic
- Lebanon
- Singapore
- Norway
- Philippines
- UAE
- Tanzania
- Japan
- Malaysia
- Germany
- Oman
- Slovakia
- Chile
- Spain
- Uganda
- Lybia
- Egypt
- Taiwan
- With Governments & Armed Forces
- With the Defence Industry
- Education & Training
- Tackling Defence Corruption Around the World
- Focus Areas
- Tools & Resources
- Publications
- FAQ
- Media Room
- Blog
- Press Releases
- Defence Corruption News Digest
- Our Programme in the Media
- Upcoming Events
- What we are Reading/Listening to
- Events Archive
- News Archive
- 'The Transparency of Defence Budgets' got high media attention in launch in Malaysia
- jobs
Sir Stewart Eldon's presentation: Anti-corruption measures are key when overcoming conflict
|
“If you don’t build institutions, you will not overcome conflict and you risk falling into the vicious circle of becoming a failing state, then falling into conflict again, then going through reconstruction, and then becoming a failing state again. Unless you get the institutions right, you are not going to have a lasting solution. Corruption has a role in sabotaging institutions and it’s important to factor this into the conflict matrix” he explained. Nevertheless, this is very difficult to achieve. It is well documented that the position of a conflict negotiator is not an easy place to be. “If you are appointed and you start and there are people fighting and killing each other, you are under an enormous pressure to produce a deal, and that in turn pressures you into just focusing on the positions of the two or three main protagonists” explained Eldon. As the experience in Afghanistan, Sierra Leone and other places show, the position of these protagonists may not be the one which is best suited for the long-term security of the country. Sir Stewart’s 30-year experience in this area has taught him it’s all about taking a step back and pausing, so that negotiators can figure out what they should be really aiming at. “Corruption is an important part of it, as it can be the main spoiler of the process” he stressed. Why bother with tackling corruption? Although there is a temptation to live with it and design things around it, that doesn’t work according to Eldon. The alternative of accepting some corrupt practices as a way of closing a deal shouldn’t lightly be an option either. “Clean settlements are more durable and cheaper. Turning the blind eye to corruption in the beginning or during the settlement process will come back and bite you” warned Eldon. He explained the conflict resolution process can be divided into four stages, all of which have corruption risks which need to be addressed:
You can listen to this presentation below: Corruption and Conflict TI-DSP at GWU by TI Defence Read more on this visit to the USA. Download a video of the presentation. Download the presentation's slides. Read more News from our Programme. Read more from our Media Room. Learn more on Our Work and Focus Areas.
|






Sir Stewart