- Home
- About Us
- Our Work
- Why It Matters
- Defence Corruption Risks Typology
- Diagnosing Corruption Risks
- Metrics & Surveys
- Self-Assessment Process
- research
- TI Defence Company Index
- Preliminary Results
- Northrop Grumman
- Babcock International
- Boeing
- DCNS
- EMBRAER
- Finmeccanica
- Fujitsu
- Lockheed Martin
- Rolls Royce
- Safran
- Thales
- BAE Systems
- Dyncorp
- General Electric
- Harris Corporation
- Hewlett Packard
- Raytheon
- Honeywell
- ITT Corporation
- KBR Inc
- Kongsberg
- L3 Communications
- Nec Corporation
- Rockwell Collins
- SAIC Company
- ST Engineering
- Meggit
- Thyssen Krupp
- Arsenal AD
- Cobham
- Curtiss Wright
- Day & Zimmermann
- General Dynamics
- Patria
- QinetiQ
- Rafael Advanced Defense Systems
- Cobham
- RUAG
- Russian Helicopters
- Saab
- Textron
- Ultra Electronics
- Serco
- EADS
- Dassault Aviation
- Fluor
- Diehl Stiftung
- CAE Inc
- MDBA Missile Systems
- Thyssen Krupp 2
- Finmeccanica 2
- Goodrich Corporation
- United Technologies
- Aselsan
- Agility
- Preliminary Results
- Government Index
- With Governments & Armed Forces
- With the Defence Industry
- Education & Training
- Tackling Defence Corruption Around the World
- Focus Areas
- Tools & Resources
- Publications
- FAQ
- Media Room
- News Archive
- Upcoming Events
- Blog
- Press Releases
- What we are Reading/Listening to
- Defence Corruption News Digest
- Our Programme in the Media
- Events Archive
- 'The Transparency of Defence Budgets' got high media attention in launch in Malaysia
- Recruitment
Press Releases
Please find our latest defence corruption press releases in the links below. For media enquiries and/or more information, please contact Maria Gili, our Communications Officer.
Chile’s defence budget transparency is an example for South America, study finds.
Thursday, 06 October 2011
Transparency Internationals Defence and Security Programme’s new report finds that many countries disclose only limited or no information on national defence and security spending to their citizens. This hinders the ability of the public to hold their defence and security establishments to account for their spending decisions.
Chile stands out as an example in South America, due to its robust systems and its accountable defence establishments.
UK scores high for defence budget transparency, but room for reform remains
Thursday, 06 October 2011
Transparency International’s Defence and Security Programme’s new report finds that many countries disclose only limited or no information on national defence and security spending to their citizens. This hinders the ability of the public to hold their defence and security establishments to account for their spending decisions.
Although regionally the UK is in the top group with other eight European countries, the score which gave it its ranking are not the highest. Although the audit reports of the classified budget are made available to parliament, legislators are not provided with some details regarding the spending on secret items.
Investors’ anti-corruption statement will strengthen Arms Trade Treaty
Thursday, 14 July 2011
As UN member states meet to discuss the Arms Trade Treaty (ATT) in New York this week, Transparency International UK underlines the need to ensure that the stronger controls over arms transfers set out in the treaty, are not undermined by corruption.
Norway and Australia lead by example on Military Codes of Conduct matters, study finds.
Tuesday, 28 June 2011
Defence establishments in most countries give very little guidance to their senior officers and officials, as a new study by Transparency International UK’s Defence and Security Programme’s on Codes of Conduct in Defence Ministries and Armed Forces shows. There seems to be little or no guidance on corruption risks and insufficient training in most countries covered by the study. Good practice examples like Norway and Australia are the exceptions.
Corruption threatens the success of the international mission in Afghanistan
Friday, 13 May 2011
The Defence and Security Programme at Transparency International UK teamed up with Konrad Adenauer Stiftung, and the Royal Services Institute (RUSI) to support a positive transition process for Afghanistan. Their advice is for the Afghan President to embrace these recommendations as his own mission against corruption, and to channel the public anger against corruption into a force for change.





