- Home
- About Us
- Our Work
- Why It Matters
- Defence Corruption Risks Typology
- Diagnosing Corruption Risks
- Metrics & Surveys
- Self-Assessment Process
- research
- TI Defence Company Index
- Preliminary Results
- Northrop Grumman
- Babcock International
- Boeing
- DCNS
- EMBRAER
- Finmeccanica
- Fujitsu
- Lockheed Martin
- Rolls Royce
- Safran
- Thales
- BAE Systems
- Dyncorp
- General Electric
- Harris Corporation
- Hewlett Packard
- Raytheon
- Honeywell
- ITT Corporation
- KBR Inc
- Kongsberg
- L3 Communications
- Nec Corporation
- Rockwell Collins
- SAIC Company
- ST Engineering
- Meggit
- Thyssen Krupp
- Arsenal AD
- Cobham
- Curtiss Wright
- Day & Zimmermann
- General Dynamics
- Patria
- QinetiQ
- Rafael Advanced Defense Systems
- Cobham
- RUAG
- Russian Helicopters
- Saab
- Textron
- Ultra Electronics
- Serco
- EADS
- Dassault Aviation
- Fluor
- Diehl Stiftung
- CAE Inc
- MDBA Missile Systems
- Thyssen Krupp 2
- Finmeccanica 2
- Goodrich Corporation
- United Technologies
- Aselsan
- Agility
- Preliminary Results
- Government Index
- With Governments & Armed Forces
- With the Defence Industry
- Education & Training
- Tackling Defence Corruption Around the World
- Focus Areas
- Tools & Resources
- Publications
- FAQ
- Media Room
- News Archive
- Upcoming Events
- Blog
- Press Releases
- What we are Reading/Listening to
- Defence Corruption News Digest
- Our Programme in the Media
- Events Archive
- 'The Transparency of Defence Budgets' got high media attention in launch in Malaysia
- Recruitment
Personnel Risks
Personnel can both abuse their positions for personal gain and fall victim, directly or indirectly, to others’ corruption. A staff with integrity and trust in the establishment they work for is key to the effective functioning of the armed forces and defence and security establishments.
Transparency International's Defence and Security Programme (TI-DSP) identifies four areas of corruption risk that may be caused by or affected by personnel.





