- Companies Index
- Government Index
- Home
- About Us
- Our Work
- Why It Matters
- Defence Corruption Risks Typology
- Diagnosing Corruption Risks
- Metrics & Surveys
- Self-Assessment Process
- research
- Companies Index
- Preliminary Results
- Northrop Grumman
- MTU Aero Engines
- Babcock International
- DCNS
- EMBRAER
- Fujitsu
- Lockheed Martin
- Rolls Royce
- Safran
- Thales
- BAE Systems
- Dyncorp
- General Electric
- Harris Corporation
- Hewlett Packard
- Raytheon
- Honeywell
- ITT Corporation
- KBR Inc
- L3 Communications
- Nec Corporation
- Rockwell Collins
- SAIC
- ST Engineering
- Meggit
- Arsenal AD
- Cobham
- Curtiss Wright
- Day & Zimmermann
- General Dynamics
- Patria
- QinetiQ
- Rafael Advanced Defense Systems
- RUAG
- Russian Helicopters
- Saab
- Textron
- Ultra Electronics
- Serco
- EADS
- Dassault Aviation
- Fluor
- Diehl Stiftung
- CAE Inc
- MDBA Missile Systems
- Thyssen Krupp 2
- Finmeccanica 2
- Goodrich Corporation
- United Technologies
- Aselsan
- Agility
- Jacobs Engineering
- Wyle
- Cubic Corporation
- AAR
- Alion Science and Technology
- ATK
- Booz Allen Hamilton
- CSC
- FLIR
- Mantech
- Teledyne Technologies
- VSE Corporation
- Nammo
- Daewoo
- Samsung
- MTU
- Otokar
- Oshkosh Corporation
- Krauss-Maffei Wegmann
- Damen Schelde
- LIG Nex 1
- Poongsan
- Chemring
- Rheinmetall
- Hindustan Aeronautics
- Navantia
- CACI International
- General Atomics
- SRA International
- SRC Inc
- URS Corporation
- Fincantieri
- Mitsubishi Heavy Industries
- Indra
- Aviation Industry Corporation
- Avibras
- Avio
- Battelle
- Bharat Earth Movers Limited
- Bharat Electronics
- Boustead
- Bumar Group
- China Shipbuilding Industry Corporation
- Navistar
- Doosan DST
- Elbit Systems
- GKN
- Gorky Automobile Plant
- Israel Aerospace Industries
- Israel Military Industries
- Kawasaki Heavy Industries
- Mitsubishi Electric
- Nexter
- Zodiac SA Holding
- Denel
- RTI Systems
- Accenture
- Abu Dhabi Shipbuilding
- Tatra
- testing
- Defence Companies Anti-Corruption Index: Preliminary results - Part B
- Preliminary Results
- Government Index
- Gov Index Preliminary Results
- Kenya
- Russia
- Ghana
- Hungary
- Cyprus
- Argentina
- France
- Cote D'Ivoire
- Serbia
- Afghanistan
- Iran
- Bulgaria
- Kazakhstan
- Croatia
- Algeria
- Jordan
- Thailand
- Ukraine
- Italy
- India
- Nigeria
- Iraq
- Eritrea
- Cameroon
- Syria
- Sweden
- Somalia
- China
- Democratic Republic of the Congo
- South Africa
- Israel
- Kuwait
- Latvia
- West Bank
- Rwanda
- Singapore
- Ethiopia
- Nepal
- Turkey
- Pakistan
- United Kingdom
- Bangladesh
- Brazil
- USA
- Belarus
- Australia
- Georgia
- Poland
- Qatar
- Uzbekistan
- Venezuela
- Colombia
- Greece
- Saudi Arabia
- Austria
- Morocco
- Yemen
- Zimbabwe
- Indonesia
- Bahrain
- Sri Lanka
- Angola
- Tunisia
- South Korea
- Bosnia and Herzegovina
- Mexico
- Czech Republic
- Lebanon
- Singapore
- Norway
- Philippines
- UAE
- Tanzania
- Japan
- Malaysia
- Germany
- Oman
- Slovakia
- Chile
- Spain
- Uganda
- Lybia
- Egypt
- Taiwan
- With Governments & Armed Forces
- With the Defence Industry
- Education & Training
- Tackling Defence Corruption Around the World
- Focus Areas
- Tools & Resources
- Publications
- FAQ
- Media Room
- Defence Corruption News Digest
- News Archive
- Upcoming Events
- Our Programme in the Media
- What we are Reading/Listening to
- Press Releases
- Events Archive
- 'The Transparency of Defence Budgets' got high media attention in launch in Malaysia
- Blog
- jobs
Nato Building Integrity
|
Countering corruption in the defence sector requires a high level of political commitment, and the active engagement of the defence leadership in initiating change. However in many nations defence corruption is not a widely discussed subject and in fact it is often unmentionable. This is not to say that senior officers and defence officials are not acutely aware of the effects of corruption within their own organisations, or that they do not understand how it impacts on the pride of the civilian and military staff in their service, but as the issue affects all levels and all functions in many different ways it is often considered and addressed in a very fragmented manner. In order to contribute to nations' understanding of defence corruption as a distinct issue which requires an overarching approach, and to enable individuals and groups to have policy impact within defence institutions, Transparency International in co-operation with NATO has developed a one week education course for senior officers and defence officials. Since 2008 the course has been successfully run thirteen times in 5 countries, and has included over 250 participants from 22 nations. In November 2010, the Building Integrity in Defence Establishments course was accredited by NATO as a formal course and is now available at all NATO schools in Europe for those who wish to enrol. Our Approach on Building IntegrityThe Building Integrity Course aims to strengthen the foundation for leadership, integrity, good governance and change management in the approach to countering corruption within the defence and security sector. It is aimed at the next generation of senior defence leaders, full colonels and above, senior defence ministry officials and those with a role in the middle of the hierarchy in effecting change. We take a participatory and constructive approach to providing participants with the knowledge, understanding and attitude needed to tackle corruption in the defence sector in their own countries. Emphasis is placed on open communication and building relationships between participants, staff and speakers. Individual contributions to the course are encouraged, and discussion groups, case studies and guest speakers are a widely employed mechanism for sharing knowledge. This approach fosters a cross-cultural examination of the topic of corruption in the defence sphere and advances awareness and understanding of experiences and best practice in implementing concrete preventive counter-corruption mechanisms in nations. For further details on the Building Integrity course, follow the links below:
Contact us for more information on our course, to arrange a course in your country, and/or to apply as a teacher or a student. Read more on Education & Training. Read more on Our Work. Course OutlineIn order to strengthen integrity and reduce corruption, the course objectives aim to enhance knowledge and understanding of:
The course has been developed around the Transparency International defence and security corruption typology, which provides a framework (above) in which to understand the main corruption risks as applicable to defence and why a comprehensive approach to countering corruption in the defence sector is essential.
While neither definitive nor exhaustive, the framework is robust enough to serve as the starting point for most nations. It breaks the generality of defence and security corruption down into five broad headings encompassing different types of corruption. Over the course of the week each of the major corruption risk areas is covered in more detail, and the major tools and best practices for addressing those risks are examined. Building Integrity: Stakeholders & PartneringA key strength of the Building Integrity Course is the range of partner institutions and stakeholders who actively participate both in course delivery and in the development of the syllabus and course materials; we actively seek to bring practitioner experience into the educational environment. NATO, the United Kingdom Defence Academy, Geneva Centre for Security Policy, the Swedish National Defence College and the Peace Support Operations Training Centre (PSOTC) in Sarajevo have all contributed to shaping the aims and objectives of the course, and to ensuring that the five day programme is as informative and beneficial to participants as possible. The active engagement of key stakeholders within nations and international institutions has also the course in this regard. The delivery of case studies by senior defence leaders who have initiated and directed the counter-corruption efforts within their own ministries and institutions provides a wealth of credible and authentic material to provide participants ideas and suggestions for implementing a change process in their national defence and security establishments. Example case studies include:
A strong emphasis is also placed on the role of the media and civil society in building integrity and countering corruption. Civil society and media organisations are actively encouraged to attend the course as full participants and as speakers. This facilitates a shared understanding of the issue and aids the development of links between defence and the media and civil society, critical to breaking down negative perceptions on both sides and an essential first step in enhancing the accountability and transparency of defence institutions through engagement with external stakeholders. Building Integrity: Added Value & Impact
The emphasis placed on building a long term community of defence integrity practitioners, enhancing expertise, and fostering the will to implement change within defence establishments means that the Building Integrity Course is unlike a traditional military education programme. Our strategic approach, focussing on the senior cadre of officers and defence officials who have the capacity to influence up and down the chain of command, magnifies the impact of the education we provide and ensures greatest effect within the defence and security institutions of participating nations. |






