- Home
- About Us
- Our Work
- Why It Matters
- Defence Corruption Risks Typology
- Diagnosing Corruption Risks
- Metrics & Surveys
- Self-Assessment Process
- research
- TI Defence Company Index
- Preliminary Results
- Northrop Grumman
- Babcock International
- Boeing
- DCNS
- EMBRAER
- Finmeccanica
- Fujitsu
- Lockheed Martin
- Rolls Royce
- Safran
- Thales
- BAE Systems
- Dyncorp
- General Electric
- Harris Corporation
- Hewlett Packard
- Raytheon
- Honeywell
- ITT Corporation
- KBR Inc
- Kongsberg
- L3 Communications
- Nec Corporation
- Rockwell Collins
- SAIC Company
- ST Engineering
- Meggit
- Thyssen Krupp
- Arsenal AD
- Cobham
- Curtiss Wright
- Day & Zimmermann
- General Dynamics
- Patria
- QinetiQ
- Rafael Advanced Defense Systems
- Cobham
- RUAG
- Russian Helicopters
- Saab
- Textron
- Ultra Electronics
- Serco
- EADS
- Dassault Aviation
- Fluor
- Diehl Stiftung
- CAE Inc
- MDBA Missile Systems
- Thyssen Krupp 2
- Finmeccanica 2
- Goodrich Corporation
- United Technologies
- Aselsan
- Agility
- Preliminary Results
- Government Index
- With Governments & Armed Forces
- With the Defence Industry
- Education & Training
- Tackling Defence Corruption Around the World
- Focus Areas
- Tools & Resources
- Publications
- FAQ
- Media Room
- News Archive
- Upcoming Events
- Blog
- Press Releases
- What we are Reading/Listening to
- Defence Corruption News Digest
- Our Programme in the Media
- Events Archive
- 'The Transparency of Defence Budgets' got high media attention in launch in Malaysia
- Recruitment
Codes of Conduct
Standards and values that govern how individual officials of the Defence Ministry and officers in the armed forces are expected to behave is a critical part of strengthening integrity. TI-DSP has conducted extensive research on codes of conduct and standards, with a survey of 32 nations in 2008 and a more in-depth study in 2010-2011. We have found that although some governments have clear and thorough statements of values and standards to guide officials’ behaviour, many do not.
Every nation and armed service should have clear, easily understood and well disseminated guidance on ethical standards. This should include:
- A statement of values. This should include including such values as integrity, honesty, and diligence.
- A Code of Conduct. This provides officers and officials with guidance on acceptable behavior and ways to avoid and prevent corruption through good personal conduct.
- The legal framework. This outlines the statutes, civil service acts, and disciplinary codes that underpin ethics systems.
Codes of conduct must include guidance on four key areas of corruption risk: bribery, gifts and hospitality, conflicts of interest, and post-separation requirements.
Developing a comprehensive ethics programme is an ongoing, constant exercise to train people in the standards expected and to monitor adherence, and to lead by example from the top.
Read more on Our Work with Governments and Armed Forces.
Read more on Our Work.





